Opinion: Families Do Not Have To Choose Between Community And Excellence

TL;DR

Prime Big Deal Days · Oct 6–7Offer from Amazon

Get baby and family essentials delivered free — and shop member deals

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

A commentary published by The 74 argues that families should not have to choose between schools that reflect and affirm their communities and schools that provide strong academics. It points to research on charter-school outcomes and effective teaching practices, while acknowledging that the cited studies do not establish that every charter school succeeds or resolve broader questions about school quality and access.

The 74 published an opinion article arguing that families should not have to choose between a school that affirms their children’s community and one that offers academic rigor. The author, writing from the perspective of a Black parent in Newark, says high-performing public charter schools can provide both, while recognizing that school segregation and unequal investment remain serious problems.

The author describes living with his family in Newark’s South Ward and weighing schools that reflected their community against concerns about safety, instruction and academic preparation. He says the family chose KIPP Spark Academy, describing it as a school whose students reflected the neighborhood and whose teachers both supported and challenged his children. The source does not provide the author’s name or the date of publication.

The article cites several studies to support its case for charter schools. It says a Stanford study found that Black students in network-operated charter schools gained the equivalent of 41 additional days of reading and 47 days of math learning compared with peers in traditional public schools. It also reports that Hispanic students at network-operated schools gained 22 more days in reading and 30 more days in math than students at stand-alone charter schools. Those figures describe the comparisons reported in the article; they are not evidence that every charter school produces the same outcomes.

The author also points to research using randomized admissions lotteries, which the article says found increased test scores and four-year college enrollment among urban charter-school students. A separate Mathematica study, as summarized in the opinion piece, found that attending both a KIPP middle school and a KIPP high school raised the likelihood of graduating from a four-year college within five years by about 19 percentage points. The article presents these findings as evidence for its argument, not as a guarantee of results for individual students.

The Choice Between Belonging and Rigor

The article addresses a practical decision facing families: whether a school can reflect a child’s identity and community while also providing demanding coursework, effective teaching and preparation for future study. Its argument is that families should not be asked to accept weak academic provision in exchange for a sense of belonging, or to leave their community to find challenging instruction.

The stakes extend beyond school choice. The author acknowledges that housing patterns, funding decisions and political choices have shaped unequal educational opportunities. He argues that those structural conditions need attention, but that children also need strong teaching and support now. The piece therefore makes a case for pursuing longer-term reforms alongside immediate efforts to improve schools.

It also recognizes a case for integrated schools, saying they can help students understand people across racial and economic lines and support civic cohesion. The author’s position is that integration and strong schools serving predominantly Black and Brown communities need not be competing goals. The article does not establish that charter schools are the sole or best route to those outcomes.

Newark Schools and the Research Cited

The author’s family decision is set against the conditions he describes in Newark’s South Ward: residential segregation, historic disinvestment and shortcomings in school administration and instruction. These are the author’s account of the neighborhood and its schools, not a detailed assessment of every school in Newark. The article frames the family’s choice as a response to the options available to them.

To discuss what may improve achievement, the author cites a New York Times Upshot analysis in which 37 education researchers ranked small-group tutoring and evidence-based reading instruction among effective approaches. The article also lists high-quality curricula, access to advanced courses, teacher coaching and accountability as promising strategies. Its account stresses that no single intervention is sufficient and that results depend on how well schools carry out strategies over time.

The author connects those practices to the work of charter networks, which can organize curriculum, teacher development and school systems across multiple schools. The cited studies cover particular settings and comparisons; the article does not provide enough methodological detail to assess their full scope or whether findings apply across all schools and regions.

““Our children get one education.””

— The opinion article’s author

Limits of the Evidence and Argument

The source does not identify the opinion writer by name, give the article’s publication date or provide links and full methodological details for each study it cites. Readers therefore cannot use the supplied material alone to examine how the studies selected schools, measured learning or accounted for differences among students and communities.

It is also unclear how broadly the reported results apply beyond the charter networks and student groups studied. The article argues that strong charter schools can combine community connection with academic performance, but it does not claim that all charter schools do so. Nor does the source compare charter schools with every available district-school model or explain how families’ access to different schools varies.

The commentary does not provide current data on Newark schools, school enrollment or student outcomes. Its account of the family’s experience and its interpretation of research should be read as an argument for a particular approach, not as a comprehensive review of local schools or national policy.

The Work Schools Must Sustain

The source reports no upcoming policy decision, school change or new research release tied to the article. The next steps it advocates are ongoing school-level work: hiring and developing effective teachers, using rigorous curricula, checking what students have learned, providing support when gaps emerge, engaging families and holding school staff accountable for results.

Beyond individual schools, the author says structural barriers such as residential segregation and unequal investment still require attention. The article’s central proposal is to pursue those reforms while improving educational opportunities for children currently in school. Whether the cited strategies produce similar results in other settings remains a question for further evidence and local evaluation.

Key Questions

What is the article’s main argument?

The opinion piece argues that families should not have to trade community affirmation for academic rigor. It says high-performing public charter schools can offer both, while also supporting efforts to address segregation and unequal investment.

Which school did the author’s family choose?

The author says the family chose KIPP Spark Academy in Newark. He describes it as reflecting the neighborhood community while offering teachers who supported and challenged students.

What research does the article cite about charter schools?

It cites a Stanford study’s reported learning-day comparisons, research using randomized admissions lotteries, and a Mathematica study on KIPP middle- and high-school attendance and four-year college graduation. The source material does not include full study details, and the findings should not be assumed to apply to every charter school.

Does the author oppose school integration?

No. The article says integrated schools can benefit students and contribute to civic cohesion. The author argues that integration need not be treated as a substitute for strong schools serving predominantly Black and Brown communities.

What remains uncertain?

The supplied source does not give the opinion writer’s name or publication date, full study references, or current data on Newark schools. It also does not establish how widely the cited research findings apply across schools and communities.

Source: rss